Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

sexist threads or racist threads?

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-03 19:09

I don't have time to make both anymore, so which do you guys prefer?

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-03 19:22

I prefer racist threads because while you can change your sex, you can't change your race.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-03 19:24

Why not combine both subjects?

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-03 20:03

sheboons all the time every time

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-03 22:02

Men commit crime at a 10 times higher rate than women.
Niggers commit crime at a 10 times higher rate than men.
Imagine gazing upon a filthy subhuman nigger from the graceful and tender perspective of a woman for whom even the capacity for violence of her own brothers is a burden. If it wasn't for women and children, war would be omnipotent and eternal. They pacify us, and that is a beautiful thing. We are so lucky to have them.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-03 23:22

>>5
Except all wars are directly motivated by / fought for women and children. Without them, who would a man give the spoils of war to? Who's future would he want to protect? Dispensing with women and children entirely would actually reduce violence, greed, and various other negative things.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-03 23:33

>>6
Men go to war to protect their family against other men. If there were no men, this wouldn't be a problem. Likewise, having a family makes them think twice about committing violence. They can't afford to get injured if they have a family to take care of. If you got rid of women and children, you would have a mass of men with nothing to lose.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 0:39

>>7
Men go to war to protect their family against other men.
If you got rid of women and children, you would have a mass of men with nothing to lose.
And nothing to gain. Ergo, no wars.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 0:41

>>7
Geopolitics man, you don't even need to be a warlord to make war anymore. The days of guys going to war to protect their families are long gone, except maybe in 3rd world countries.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 4:53

>>8
I've actually thought quite a bit about what you said, because I think you have a point.

If a couple goes to a party and somebody starts hitting on the woman, the man generally becomes jealous and a conflict can erupt from that. If there is no woman in this scenario, they have no reason to fight. On the other hand, if a confrontation is imminent, the woman is there to attempt to calm the situation. The man doesn't want to fight around his woman. Even in a civilized manner, it's customary for men to "take their fight outside".

My reasoning is that considering absolute neutrality, meaning that men have nothing to gain and nothing to lose, men will make war. I think a group of men alone will be more violent than a group of men with women. And I believe that the more woman are prevalent, the less violence there will be. Of course, individual character also plays an important role, which I think will end up being the primary factor in this scenario.
>>9
Of course that's not the case. War is a racket, after all. I'm talking about how to average person sees it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 5:53

>>10
I think a group of men alone will be more violent than a group of men with women
My experience has always been the exact opposite. The presence of women brings out a competitive and violent side in men, and will disrupt camaraderie and understanding every time. And most men instinctively know that "fighting for his woman" will get him laid by that woman, while backing down from a fight will make her resent him. Sexuality brings out the animal nature - the animal nature is purely brutal and violent.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 5:58

just stop

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 7:26

(ง ͠° ͟ل͜ ͡°)ง

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 7:27

TURDUS NIGRICEPS

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 8:59

in a world without women, would men become gay?

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 9:14

>>15
No, 60% of men already identify as women, so they'd just throw on a dress and things would be back to normal more or less.

Name: the zookeeper (jesus christ) 2015-07-04 10:52

All this bullshit is only how niggers and sandniggers and clueless jocks and basement dwellers see it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 10:56

sandniggers go to war over religion
niggers do raids on other tribes for street cred and stuff, they always run away form anything stronger than them.
clueless jocks like to shove footballs up eachother's asses
basement dwellers think a greek myth has anything to do with reality and think they are greek gods pumped with millons of gallons of testosterone and cheetos lol and must defend their loli rofl (implying they need you)

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 13:59

>>1
don't have time
You don't have several minutes to spare to make a couple of extra threads and cover both topics? We're not asking for Proust novels here, Palahniuk will do.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 14:09

These racist/sexist/creeper shitposts are ruining progrider.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 14:18

Make new threads about other things then, >>22, you lazy kike.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-04 15:16

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-05 0:00

I've lived in the deep south my entire (surrounded by black people).
I have gone to school with them, eaten at restaurants beside them, played sports with them and shared the road with them.

My opinion of African Americans (from all these years)... is they are indigenous creatures that our society has unsuccessfully tried to domesticate.
They are the closest thing to an animal that a human can be. They are the missing link between humans and apes.

They think like animals, mate like animals, eat like animals and have the self control of an animal.

They have no self respect or self awareness...

They will kill their mother or their brother to serve their own wants and desires (that they cant control).

Let me close by saying... that African Americans are the PLAGUE of this country and I curse our forefathers everyday, for brining them to this country.

Ultimately the blacks will be the downfall of our country because they multiply like roaches and will over populate the good races... such as the whites, jews, asians, etc...

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-05 1:45

>>23
it's not as though we'll lose anything of actual value with the demise of the US so good riddance I say.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-05 1:59

>>23
The problem are the populist politicians, trying to appease some electorate with free give aways, which taxing to the economy. This leads to communism with one strongman generous leader, who takes wealth from the "rich" and gives to useless lazy niggers.

So in the end there will be some african warlord with an army of black soldiers, keeping white population as slaves.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-09 9:23

http://www.chinasmack.com/2008/videos/journalist-throws-shoe-at-president-bush-chinese-reactions.html
What was the brand of the shoe he threw at bush? If it was made in China, the U.S. would again say China provided terrorists with weapons.
That was VIP Quality!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List