Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Free universe but no free energy?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-02 12:26

If the universe can bang itself into existence, then how come we can't bang ourselves some energy or matter?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 22:52

proof
evidence
data
lol you materialist naturalist retards are such simpletons.

the indescribable.
hurr durr anything technical sounding is ``indescribable''

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 22:55

figures of speech are only used by normal people aka retards
being a materialist naturalist is a normal thing to do and therefore a sign of its icorrectness

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-05 22:56

incorrectness*

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 3:55

>>41
materialist naturalist retards
Oh, so you're getting asspained because you believe in some almighty G-d or other.

hurr durr anything technical sounding is ``indescribable
That's not true. But when you need to discuss things like "the beginning of time" or "the shape of the universe" you are forced to twist your words because language is simply not made for describing things like that.

>>42
normals
It's not 2008 anymore. Crying about the normals on the internet is like crying about the sand on the beach.

Name: RedCream 2015-01-06 4:08

>>33-dubs

The expansion from the state of being very small, to the current state of being very large, is what we call "the Big Bang".

Yoar pushing word-symboals around like it matters, is a poor way of making a point, other than illustrating that you have microacephaly.

Name: RedCream 2015-01-06 4:15

>>33-dubs
Neither MACHOs nor WIMPs were ever observed

That statement is very much false. We have been detecting neutrinoas. They are one of the WIMP candidates. We have also been detecting MACHOas.

"MACHO Project Makes First Detection of Dark Matter in Milky Way"
http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199507/macho.cfm

Now is time for you to admit yoar roal.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 4:23

>>44
But when you need to discuss things like "the beginning of time" or "the shape of the universe" you are forced to twist your words because language is simply not made for describing things like that.
You have no idea what you are talking about, not even wrong etc. At a very simple level you are. Stop bullshitting. What's your knowledge level?

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 4:29

>>46
July 1995 (Volume 4, Number 7)
lol

Name: RedCream 2015-01-06 4:43

>>48

FIRST detection, you numbskull.

Name: RedCream 2015-01-06 4:46

>>48

FIRST detection, you numbskull.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 4:47

>>50
Obviously you went far with your physics education/career posting on here all day everyday.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 8:21

>>47
What? The point is, you can't use words to convey, for example, the location of the universe. Because location requires space the universe is all space. However, the universe does exist and is possibly "located." But you can't explain such things with words, it requires a more pure language of math.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 9:23

>>44
Nice dubs :)

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 10:12

>>55
good double

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 10:18

>>54
Thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 11:37

>>53
>>54
>>55
Shut up before you ruin the thread, numbnuts.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 14:28

>>56
Optimize your quotes, stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-06 23:11

>>52
You are bullshitting so hard right now, stop it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 3:23

>>58
Wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 3:29

>>59
Not Even Wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2015-01-07 3:35

>>60
STFU RedCream.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List