I would love to smash yoar atoms as long as I could ensure that the subatomic particle debris that thereafter resulted would remain dispersed such that refoarmation would become statistically cloase to impossible in a span of time of Earth-noarmal years best represented by the tetration of large numbers.
Beat that, friend.
Name:
Anonymous2014-12-30 3:28
>>4 You know that I'm a male, that my request for you to smash my atoms is sexual innuendo for anal sex and so therefore you are homosexual
Name:
RedCream2014-12-30 3:31
At this juncture I would like to introaduce you all to RedCream's Number:
g(Graham's Number)
... where Graham's Number is g(64).
Shoarter noatation for RedCream's Number is:
g(g(64))
RedCream's Number was first calculated when moot perfoarmed his first general ban (B&) of RedCream off of FOARchan's /lounge/. It was calculated to be g(g(64)) when it was questioned how many penises moot was currently sucking as a result of his engaging that ban (B&). It was a fine display of mathematical establishment of soacial roal.
What the fuck! Are you positing the existence of quantum sexuality? If soa, is there a version of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle such that we can adequately explain how we can not predict which hoal yoar penis is in?