I actually consider myself the opposite of an anarchist. You could say I am an archist. Law and order rule! The more ordered and efficient something is, the more it appeals to me.
Name:
Anonymous2018-02-21 16:27
*authoritarian
Name:
Anonymous2018-02-21 20:05
I myself prefer law with just a little bit of order.
Name:
Anonymous2018-02-26 9:48
>>5 I am not really authoritarian. I think order itself is the superior condition, and people should see this for themselves and voluntarily submit to it. It is possible to have both order and freedom. I would like a hierarchical society, but the hierarchy should be justified by its efficiency, probably using merit as one of the distinguishing conditions between people.
Name:
Anonymous2018-03-06 14:42
Anarchy in itself a specific system of order which contradicts the described condition: e.g. anarcho-primitivism has certain rules and laws. Only real anarchy is complete lawless chaos, but thats not what these hippies want- they want some left-wing control system with "less oppression"(just like commies like "less capitalism").
anarchy means no government or authority. most effectual, worth listening to anarchist strains through history werent actually about removing /aboslutely everything that could be construed as authority of any kind in all circumstances/ though. often don't mean actually, literally EVERY or ALL when they say all x or every y. any form of organization ends up as some kind of authority, so the ideal of anarchists who arent retarded masturbators is for it to be minimized a far as possible. authority should be weak and accountible as possible and easy to overthrow.
Name:
Anonymous2018-05-18 16:12
👉 1
Judging from the other threads by now, you should be realized that the purpose of /anarchy/ board is just another dumping ground use to shift any useless AKA shitpost from /lounge/ or /programming/ to here!