>>10The issue with having so many boards is that it stratifies the userbase. The four (three of which are listed) boards we have no obviously aren't of the clearest distinction, but the delineation is clear enough that having them exist as separate boards is apropos. Look at 4-ch. Dozens upon dozens of boards, and the only with a justifiable niche just happens to be the only active one, DQN. Having that many boards is paralyzing. Users see all those boards (many of which overlap each other in topic, as with the three language boards or the technology boards and internet addicts) and decide it's not worth their time, because there's vary little that can guarantee the consistent activity and growth of those boards.